When the logos of nicely-recognized manufacturers are included in a survey about design, the outcomes will probably be affected by greater than the design in isolation, so I do not know if any definitive outcomes may be drawn. Nonetheless, I used to be to see that Siegel+Gale used the logos of one hundred famend manufacturers to survey three,000 individuals within the UK and US.
The report’s labelled as “a reality-based mostly information that gives benchmarks towards which corporations can consider the effectiveness of a emblem, and make knowledgeable selections about the way to design them.”
From the one hundred logos used within the research, respondents have been every proven a random choice of 30 designs throughout all the 9 emblem remedies within the under picture.
Every remedy evoked particular traits and perceptions. As a primary instance, wordmarks with serifs have been extra generally related to sophistication and exclusivity than any of the opposite remedies.
When respondents have been requested to call and describe the logos they discovered most memorable, probably the most incessantly cited have been unsurprisingly Nike, Apple, Coca-Cola and McDonald’s. On the similar time, logos for manufacturers with comparable media budgets weren’t as memorable as compared (Google, Adidas, Pepsi, and Amazon, amongst others). The report lists one of many foremost causes for the distinction because the simplicity of the mark, excluding Coca-Cola, however is Coke the most important advertising phenomenon of the lot?
Obtain the report on the Siegel+Gale website in trade in your identify and e mail tackle. There isn’t any disclaimer, so alternatively head to Adweek for a abstract.
By way of Brand New.
The post A research on emblem remedies and model perceptions appeared first on DICKLEUNG DESIGN 2014.
沒有留言:
張貼留言